Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant on appeal from his conviction for grand larceny, third degree, argues that the trial court erroneously ruled admissible for impeachment purposes certain prior bail forfeitures and convictions relating to public intoxication incidents which had occurred 11 and 12 years earlier (see People v Sandoval,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
