MAYEA v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

No. CA 18641.

635 P.2d 400 (1981)

54 Or.App. 510

Glenn MAYEA and Kelly G. Ross, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1981.

Reconsideration Denied December 10, 1981.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank M. Parisi, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were George L. Kirklin, Michael J. Lilly, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell & Bledsoe, Portland.

Mary J. Deits, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen., and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Petitioners, intervenors in a contested case proceeding before the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC), seek judicial review of LCDC's order which requires Curry County to adopt a comprehensive plan and implementing measures to comply with LCDC's statewide planning goals.1

The facts are not in dispute. The county did not have its comprehensive plan in compliance with statewide planning goals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases