1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 635 P.2d
  5. 635 P.2d 394 (1981)
 

RIDDLE v. CAIN

No. 874-8; CA 17353.

635 P.2d 394 (1981)

54 Or.App. 474

Robert G. RIDDLE, Appellant, v. Milo Ladean CAIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 2, 1981.

Reconsideration Denied December 10, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Grant, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Grant, Ferguson & Carter, Medford.

John W. Eads, Jr., Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Frohnmayer, Deatherage, deSchweinitz & Eads, Medford.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant in this action arising out of a vehicle accident. Defendant was an employe of Lake County acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident. The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff did not comply with the Oregon Tort Claims Act notice requirement. ORS 30.275(1). We affirm.

The accident occurred in February, 1978. Plaintiff alleges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases