1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 276 S.E.2d
  5. 276 S.E.2d 743 (1981)
 

THOMAS v. HOWARD

No. 8020DC626.

276 S.E.2d 743 (1981)

Kenneth THOMAS v. Richard HOWARD.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. A. Hightower, Wadesboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

F. D. Poisson, Jr., Wadesboro, for defendant-appellant.

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant's brief does not comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure in several respects. It does not contain a statement of the questions presented for review. App.R. 28(b)(1). In addition, it does not include a short, nonargumentative summary of the essential facts. App.R. 28(b)(2). Finally, the brief makes no reference to the assignment of error or exception in the record which is pertinent to defendant's argument on appeal. App.R. 28(b)(3). In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases