1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 276 S.E.2d
  5. 276 S.E.2d 738 (1981)
 

STATE v. DANIELS

No. 802SC456.

276 S.E.2d 738 (1981)

STATE of North Carolina v. Clarence Melvin DANIELS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 7, 1981.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. John R. B. Matthis and Associate Atty. Gen. John F. Maddrey, Raleigh, for State.

Wilkinson & Vosburgh by James R. Vosburgh, Washington, for defendant-appellant.

WHICHARD, Judge.

We note at the outset that defendant's brief does not comply with North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 28(b)(3), in that it does not state the questions presented separately with a reference following each question to the assignments of error and exceptions pertinent thereto. Nor does it comply with Appellate Rule 28(b)(4) which requires "[a] short conclusion stating the precise relief sought." We nevertheless consider the contentions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases