1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 108 Cal.App.3d
  5. 108 Cal.App.3d 867 (1980)
 

CHAPPLE v. BIG BEAR SUPER MARKET NO. 3

Docket No. 18785.

108 Cal.App.3d 867 (1980)

167 Cal. Rptr. 103

MARY CHAPPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BIG BEAR SUPER MARKET NO. 3 et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 1, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Weissman, Johns & Gamer and Peter P. Gamer for Defendants and Appellants.

Joseph P. McDonough for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

STANIFORTH, J.

Mary Chapple's suit sought damages for breach of contract and negligence against Big Bear Super Market No. 3 (Big Bear) and Robert Petrich. Big Bear contracted to build a theatre for Chapple. Chapple charged Big Bear, without her consent, reduced the capacity of air conditioning equipment from the contract specified 20.43 tons to an inadequate 8-ton output. After a nonjury trial, the court awarded $11,180 damages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases