1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 107 Cal.App.3d
  5. 107 Cal.App.3d 866 (1980)
 

ORTIZ v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Docket No. 5606.

107 Cal.App.3d 866 (1980)

166 Cal. Rptr. 100

GREGORIA ORTIZ et al., Petitioners, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MADERA COUNTY et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

June 30, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Pamela J. Stanley, Frank T. Ramirez, Ramon P. Arias, David O. Hernandez and Dennis De Leon for Petitioners.

Mark A. Wasser, County Counsel, for Respondents.

OPINION

HOPPER, Acting P.J.

In this case we consider the validity of an ordinance adopted by the Board of Supervisors (hereinafter Board) of Madera County redistricting supervisorial districts in the County of Madera (hereinafter County). For reasons hereinafter discussed we conclude that the ordinance was ineffective for use in the June 3, 1980, election because a redistricting ordinance may not go into effect immediately.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases