CADEL v. SHERBURNE CORP.

No. 438-79.

425 A.2d 546 (1980)

June CADEL v. SHERBURNE CORPORATION.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument Denied December 8, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bloomer & Bloomer, Rutland, for plaintiff.

Miller, Norton & Cleary, Rutland, John Paul Faignant, Rutland (on the brief), for defendant.

Before BARNEY, C. J., DALEY, LARROW and HILL, JJ., and JENKINS, District Judge, Specially Assigned.


LARROW, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment, after jury verdict in her action for injuries received while skiing. She claimed negligence and breach of warranty by the defendant in leasing and fitting to her boots, skis and release bindings, so-called, which failed to release when she fell. Causation of a knee injury appears to have been the principal issue at trial. The defendant contended her injuries resulted from her fall, an inherent risk of skiing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases