STATE v. TRUEBLOOD

No. 7912SC1173.

265 S.E.2d 664 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Sequoyah E. TRUEBLOOD.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 6, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Daniel C. Oakley, Raleigh, for the State.

Coolidge, Clarke, Hutchens & Waple by Mark L. Waple, and Barfield & Canders by K. Douglas Barfield, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant.


MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant brings forward and argues in his brief four assignments of error. The first is directed to the denial by the court of defendant's motion to suppress all evidence against defendant which was, according to defendant, taken in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. This question was fully discussed and decided against defendant in State v. Trueblood, ___ N.C.App. ___, 265 S.E.2d 662 (1980). No useful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases