1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 101 Cal.App.3d
  5. 101 Cal.App.3d 821 (1980)
 

BISHOP v. ANDERSON

Docket No. 46362.

101 Cal.App.3d 821 (1980)

161 Cal. Rptr. 884

CURTIS BISHOP et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. ARTHUR ANDERSON, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

February 4, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

William Coverdale for Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Rankin, Oneal, Center, Luckhardt, Marlais, Lund & Hinshaw and Mark G. Hyde for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

POCHE, J.

The Bishops appeal from a judgment entered in favor of respondent Arthur Anderson, M.D., in an action for damages arising from malpractice. After denying appellants' request for trial by jury, the trial judge heard the case and determined that the Bishops' suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Here, appellants raise several questions with respect to respondent's statute of limitations defense and in addition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases