Defendant contends that plaintiffs failed to provide a medical authorization pursuant to an order of the court. Plaintiffs contend that a misunderstanding arose on the part of their counsel when he furnished to defendants the medical records sought to be obtained by the medical authorization. In any event, the medical authorization was furnished on March 19, 1980. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion.
Order affirmed,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
