CROW v. WASHINGTON CTY. BD. OF PRISON INSP.

Civ. A. No. 79-587.

504 F.Supp. 412 (1980)

Juanita CROW, Administratrix of the Estate of Ralph R. Crow, Deceased, individually and on behalf of the next of kin and children of Ralph R. Crow, Deceased, and on behalf of the Estate of Ralph R. Crow, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF PRISON INSPECTORS, Frank Mascara, member of the Washington County Prison Board; Jess D. Costa, member of the Washington County Prison Board; James A. Fazzoni, member of the Washington County Prison Board; Malcolm L. Morgan, member of the Washington County Prison Board; David L. Gilmore, member of the Washington County Prison Board; Edward M. Paluso, member of the Washington County Prison Board; Honorable Charles G. Sweet, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, member of the Washington County Prison Board; Jay R. Taylor, individually, and in his capacity as Warden of the Washington County Prison; Louis Matullo, individually and in his capacity as a Correctional Officer I of the Washington County Prison; Paul Ross, individually and in his capacity as Correction Officer II of the Washington County Prison; Patsy Magruda, individually and in his capacity as a Correction Officer I in the Washington County Prison; Robert L. Poland, individually, and in his capacity as Deputy Warden of the Washington County Prison; Richard Brezenski, individually and in his capacity as Sergeant of the Washington County Prison, Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

December 9, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen P. McCloskey, William Mitchell, Washington, Pa., for plaintiff.

Robert L. Ceisler, Washington, Pa., for defendants.


OPINION

TEITELBAUM, District Judge.

Currently before this Court are the defendants' Motion to Dismiss all the counts in the plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and, in the alternative, a Motion on behalf of the County of Washington (County) and the Washington County Board of Prison Inspectors (Prison Board) for a More Definite Statement. In order to adequately consider the motions, it is necessary to review the entire case.

In May of 1979, plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases