HEINTZELMAN v. HEINTZELMAN

No. 14737.

609 P.2d 295 (1980)

Mary Ellen HEINTZELMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Emery HEINTZELMAN, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Decided April 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Baiz, Jr., Great Falls, Kenneth R. Olson argued, Great Falls, for plaintiff and appellant.

Ralph Randono argued, Great Falls, for defendant and respondent.


SHEA, Justice.

The wife appeals from an order of the Cascade County District Court modifying the maintenance provision of an original dissolution decree.

The original dissolution decree provided for child custody, child support, and a property division. The decree also required the husband to pay $250 per month in maintenance to the wife. At the time of the dissolution, the husband was employed as a brakeman by Burlington Northern, Inc. earning approximately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases