EMERSON v. ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING CO.

No. 78-3017; CA 15371.

610 P.2d 282 (1980)

45 Or.App. 1083

In the matter of the Compensation of Ralph EMERSON, Claimant, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. ITT CONTINENTAL BAKING COMPANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 28, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the brief were Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, Kahn & O'Leary and Garry L. Kahn, Portland.

Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondent-cross-petitioner. With him on the brief were Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts and Delbert J. Brenneman, Portland.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and ROBERTS and CAMPBELL, JJ.


GILLETTE, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this case is whether the claimant is permanently and totally disabled. We find that he is.

The facts may be summarized as follows:

The claimant was injured on October 24, 1975, when he slipped on some grease and fell, hitting his low back on a truck bumper. At the time of his injury, claimant worked as a janitor in a bakery. Claimant had held this job for the preceding 28 years. The job included using a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases