1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 100 Cal.App.3d
  5. 100 Cal.App.3d 789 (1980)
 

KARLSON v. CITY OF CAMARILLO

Docket No. 56376.

100 Cal.App.3d 789 (1980)

161 Cal. Rptr. 260

VICTOR ALBERT KARLSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CAMARILLO, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

January 8, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Victor Albert Karlson, in pro. per., Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., John R. Phillips, Alletta d'A. Belin and Phillip H. Warren for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Royal M. Sorensen, City Attorney, Burke, Williams & Sorensen and Beatrice Joy Braun for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

KAUFMANN, J.*

This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate sought by the appellant to set aside two amendments to the general plan of the respondent (hereinafter referred to as City) enacted pursuant to Government Code section 65000 et seq. The petition alleged that amendments 77-2 and 77-3 were inconsistent with various provisions of the general plan, citing Government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases