1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 27 Cal.3d
  5. 27 Cal.3d 841 (1980)
 

PEOPLE v. GLAZE

Docket No. Crim. 21123.

27 Cal.3d 841 (1980)

614 P.2d 291

166 Cal. Rptr. 859

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WHEATLY GLAZE, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

August 7, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

W. Michael Mayock for Defendant and Appellant.

Brown, Weston & Sarno, Fleishman, Brown, Weston & Rohde, David M. Brown and G. Randall Garrou as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Burt Pines, City Attorney, George C. Eskin, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Rand Schrader, Laurie Harris and S. Thomas Todd, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BIRD, C.J.

Under the California Constitution, may a city pass an ordinance which requires only picture arcades to close between the hours of 2 a.m. and 9 a.m. in order to prevent the possibility of masturbation by any of their customers?

I

Appellant Glaze was charged in March 1978 with a violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 103.101, subdivision (g),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases