STATE v. DARRAH

No. 80-368.

64 Ohio St. 2d 22 (1980)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DARRAH, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Eugene H. Nemitz, Jr., prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Mr. Thomas S. Haney, for appellant.


CELEBREZZE, C. J.

In support of his argument that the charge against him should be dismissed, appellant contends that a weigh station sign is not a "traffic control device," and that he was unlawfully arrested for a misdemeanor not committed in the presence of the state trooper.

The threshold issue in this case is whether a weigh station sign is a traffic control device. For the reasons that follow, we hold that a weigh station sign is a traffic control device...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases