EARTH RESOURCES COMPANY OF ALASKA, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION and UNITED STATES of America, Respondents,
Sohio Pipe Line Company, Arco Pipe Line Company, Exxon Pipeline Company, and BP Pipelines, Inc., Intervenors.
EARTH RESOURCES COMPANY OF ALASKA, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
Arco Pipe Line Company and BP Pipelines, Inc., Intervenors.
EARTH RESOURCES COMPANY OF ALASKA, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued May 16, 1980.
Decided June 23, 1980.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Marc J. Fink, Washington, D. C., with whom Jacob P. Billig, Washington, D. C., was on brief, for petitioner.
George H. Williams, Jr., Atty., Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C., with whom Howard E. Shapiro, Sol., Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C., was on brief, for respondents. Robert B. Nicholson and Robert Lewis Thompson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., also entered appearances for respondents.
John Lansdale and Charles M. Carron, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for intervenor Sohio Pipe Line Co.
Robert E. Jordan, III, Steven H. Brose, and Timothy M. Walsh, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for intervenor Arco Pipe Line Co.
Richard J. Flynn and Stephen S. Hill, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for intervenor Exxon Pipeline Co.
Quinn O'Connell and R. Brian Corcoran, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for intervenor BP Pipelines, Inc.
Before WRIGHT, Chief Judge, MacKINNON, Circuit Judge, and PENN, District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Opinion for the court per curiam.
PER CURIAM:
In light of our decision today in Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. FERC,628 F.2d 235, D.C.Cir. 1980, we hold that this case does not present a reviewable final order of the Commission. Under Section 502(a) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7192(a) (Supp. II 1978), this court has the same jurisdiction to review FERC orders concerning oil pipelines...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
