1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 110 Cal.App.3d
  5. 110 Cal.App.3d 740 (1980)
 

ROSENER v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Docket No. 41334.

110 Cal.App.3d 740 (1980)

FREDERICK A. ROSENER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant; JOSEPH F. HARTMAN et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

September 30, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Richard L. Goff, George G. Weickhardt and Marilyn R. Podemski for Defendant and Appellant.

Jewel & Leary, Howard H. Jewel, Boxer & Elkind, Stanley Blackfield and Duane B. Beeson for Plaintiffs and Respondents and for Interveners and Respondents.

OPINION

NEWSOM, J.

The present appeal is from judgments after jury trial in favor of respondents and against appellant Sears, Roebuck & Company aggregating $158,000 in compensatory and $10 million in punitive damages.

It is unnecessary to engage in an exhaustive analysis of the voluminous evidentiary record compiled during the 36-day trial. Viewing that record in a light...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases