PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order holding appellant in direct criminal contempt. First, appellant attacks the validity of the underlying order. Since the trial court had jurisdiction to render the underlying order and the order was not transparently invalid or a mere frivolous pretense to validity, the propriety of said order became insulated from attack upon the contemptuous violation thereof. Sandstrom v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.