HASKINS v. LOEB RHOADES & CO.


76 A.D.2d 751 (1980)

Priscilla R. Haskins, Appellant-Respondent, v. Loeb Rhoades & Co., Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 3, 1980


Murphy, P. J. (dissenting).

The burden of proof in a motion for summary judgment rests upon the moving party. Evidence must be produced which eliminates material and triable issues of fact, even where the opposing papers are insufficient. (Monroe Abstract & Tit. Corp. v Giallombardo, 54 A.D.2d 1084, 1085.) The adversary's version of the facts must be accepted with respect to all points as to which there is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases