Respondent Landlord does not oppose this appeal because it agrees that valet service at the building is a required service under the Rent Stabilization Law, and the parties have entered into a settlement covering the hours of such service, under which it will be in substantial compliance with the order of the C.A.B., thereby rendering this appeal moot. The effect of our dismissal is "to erase the whole case from the books". (Matter of Park East Corp. v Whalen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF TWO LINCOLN SQUARE ASSOCS. v. NEW YORK CITY CONCILIATION & APPEALS BD.
75 A.D.2d 751 (1980)
In the Matter of Two Lincoln Square Associates et al., Respondents, v. New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Appellant, and Peter C. Hein, Intervenor-Respondent-Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 6, 1980
May 6, 1980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
