1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 75 A.D.2d
  5. 75 A.D.2d 748 (1980)
 

ROSENFELD v. ROSENFELD

75 A.D.2d 748 (1980)

Jutta Rosenfeld, Respondent, v. George Rosenfeld, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 6, 1980

The dissent in its review of the pertinent facts sets forth strong policy considerations. However, the prevailing law is otherwise, and under the constraint of Jackson v Jackson (274 App Div 43); Landsman v Landsman (302 N.Y. 45); Fischer v Fischer (254 N.Y. 463), and others, we feel that any reconsideration of this rule should be left to the Court of Appeals.

Silverman, J., dissents in a memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases