ROUMEL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BD. OF ZONING

No. 79-871.

417 A.2d 405 (1980)

Theodore C. ROUMEL, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided June 16, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Donnenfeld, Washington, D. C., with whom Craig N. Moore, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Leo N. Gorman, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., with whom Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, and Richard W. Barton, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before HARRIS, MACK, and FERREN, Associate Judges.


MACK, Associate Judge:

Petitioner challenges a decision by the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment (Board) denying an area variance in an R-1-B district as arbitrary and capricious. He argues that the Board's factual findings and legal conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence. Admittedly the decision of the Board is not a model of administrative adjudication. Nevertheless, after a careful review of the record, we find sufficient evidence to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases