1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 263 S.E.2d
  5. 263 S.E.2d 556 (1980)
 

STATE v. HAMM

No. 15.

263 S.E.2d 556 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph Lee HAMM.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 5, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Ben G. Irons, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

Glenn B. Bailey, Morehead City, for defendant-appellant.

HUSKINS, Justice:

Leo Sutton testified that he was under arrest for armed robbery and had not been charged with murder. Over objection, he was permitted to say that he knew he could have been charged with murder. Defendant contends that Sutton, who was not learned in the law, was erroneously permitted to express an opinion as to what crimes he might be charged with as a result of his participation in the robbery and murder of Mrs. Arthur. This contention is without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases