DANIEL v. HIEGEL

No. 12003.

611 P.2d 207 (1980)

Ruth Hiegel DANIEL, Appellant, v. Philomena HIEGEL, Executrix of the Estate of John Maurice Hiegel, Deceased, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 22, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goodman, Oshins, Brown & Singer, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Jolley, Urga & Wirth, Las Vegas, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

On conflicting evidence the district court found that an oral agreement was made between Ruth Hiegel Daniel and her former husband, John Maurice Hiegel, now deceased, pursuant to which Ruth was to convey her interest in Exley House to John for $8600. A promissory note, deed of trust and divorce complaint, apparently executed pursuant to the oral agreement, when considered together constitute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases