FOSTER v. MARSHMAN

No. 11872.

611 P.2d 197 (1980)

George FOSTER, Appellant, v. Beverly MARSHMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 22, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Lamboley and Robert M. Sader, Reno, for appellant.

Wilson & Henderson and Gary M. Nelson, Reno, for respondent.


OPINION

MANOUKIAN, Justice:

Appellant George Foster contends the trial court should have found that respondent Beverly Marshman was precluded from recovering child support arrearages due to equitable defenses he asserted. We disagree and affirm this portion of the order of the lower court. Appellant further contends that support payments were improperly allocated to the oldest debt first. We believe this contention has substantial merit, and reverse.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases