1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 271 S.E.2d
  5. 271 S.E.2d 516 (1980)
 

WALSTON v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES

No. 8010IC240.

271 S.E.2d 516 (1980)

Cullen WALSTON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 30, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hassell & Hudson by Charles R. Hassell, Jr. and Robin E. Hudson, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Teague, Campbell, Conely & Dennis by C. Woodrow Teague, Richard B. Conely, and George W. Dennis III, Raleigh, for defendants-appellees.

ERWIN, Judge.

By appropriate assignments of error, plaintiff challenges, inter alia, the Commission's findings of fact and conclusions of law holding that plaintiff does not have an "occupational disease."

For purposes of our review, the pertinent findings of fact of Commissioner Brown and affirmed by the full Commission are as follow:

"6. ... Dr. Williams, in his written report, a part of the evidence in this case, gave the following comment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases