The defendant first contends that the trial court should have suppressed a statement made by him immediately following his apprehension and arrest. However, the statement was spontaneous and does not fall within the ambit of People v Samuels (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.