MUMFORD v. HUTTON & BOURBONNAIS CO.

No. 8025SC180.

267 S.E.2d 511 (1980)

Alex MUMFORD v. HUTTON & BOURBONNAIS COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 1, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudisill & Brackett by J. Richardson Rudisill Jr., Hickory, for plaintiff-appellant.

Patrick, Harper & Dixon by James T. Patrick, Hickory, for defendant-appellee.


HILL, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial judge erred in dismissing with prejudice his cause of action, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff urges that under the theory of notice pleading he has given sufficient notice of events or transactions which give rise to the claim to enable the adverse party to understand the nature and basis for it, to file a responsive pleading and—by using the rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases