IN RE CARLSON


174 N.J. Super. 603 (1980)

417 A.2d 103

IN THE MATTER OF MARGARET MAY CARLSON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 20, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Friedman argued the cause for appellant (Ruhlman & Butrym, attorneys; Richard A. Friedman and Cassel R. Ruhlman, Jr., on the brief).

William P. Malloy, Deputy Attorney General argued the cause for respondent Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund (John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRITZ, P.J.A.D.

The sole issue involved in this appeal concerns the time when a teacher becomes sufficiently "at work" that a subsequent accident might be said to have resulted from the performance of his or her regular or assigned duties within the contemplation of N.J.S.A. 18A:66-39(c).

The resolution of factual disagreements is not one of our problems in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases