MERZ, J.
This matter is before the court upon defendant's Motion to Suppress the results of an Intoxilyzer test administered in this case. The motion was submitted on briefs and oral testimony, presented February 5, 1980. Defendant asserted three grounds, the third of which, "other procedural error," was abandoned upon hearing.
With respect to the second ground, that the Intoxilyzer does not provide a test "by weight," defendant introduced a number of arguments...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
