SCHILLER v. GILES

No. L78-0864; CA 16109.

614 P.2d 151 (1980)

47 Or.App. 517

Robert K. SCHILLER and Barbara Schiller, Appellants, v. Elmer L. GILES, Respondent, and William Haynes, Dba Haynes House, Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 4, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Dean Heiling, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Heiling & McIntosh, Roseburg.

Jeffrey Pugh, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Neuner, Dole, Caley & Kolberg, Roseburg.

Before JOSEPH, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

During the arguments in this case we were made aware that after the allowance of defendant Giles' summary judgment on plaintiffs' amended complaint, there remained pending Giles' counterclaim for breach of contract and tort, as well as plaintiffs' action against the co-defendant and his counterclaims against them. There was neither a final order under ORS 19.010 nor an order permitting an interlocutory appeal under ORS 18.125(1).

Appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases