1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 614 P.2d
  5. 614 P.2d 148 (1980)
 

HALLCO MFG. CO. v. FOSTER

No. 6398; CA 14297.

614 P.2d 148 (1980)

47 Or.App. 369

HALLCO MANUFACTURING CO., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant, v. Keith FOSTER, Dba Keith Manufacturing Co., Respondent, Olaf Hallstrom, Defendant, and Olaf Hallstrom and Hallco Systems, Inc., Cross-Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 21, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald C. Hoover, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Maxwell Donnelly, Portland.

James W. Laws, Madras, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Shepard & Stewart, Madras.

Before JOSEPH, P.J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.

WARREN, Judge.

Plaintiff, Hallco Manufacturing Company, commenced this action against defendant, alleging three causes of action. The first was for money due for goods sold and delivered, the second for money due on a promissory note, and the third also for money due for goods sold and delivered. In his amended answer, defendant filed a counterclaim against plaintiff and third-party claims against Hallco Systems, Inc., and Olaf Hallstrom, the principal stockholder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases