1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 491 F.Supp.
  5. 491 F.Supp. 263 (1980)
 

BARCELLOS & WOLFSEN, INC. v. WESTLANDS WATER DIST.

No. CV 79-106-EDP.

491 F.Supp. 263 (1980)

BARCELLOS & WOLFSEN, INC.; Boston Ranch Company; Fabry Farms, Inc.; Marks Grain, Inc.; Edwin R. O'Neill; O'Neill Livestock Company; Valle Verde, Inc.; Plaintiffs, v. WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT; John Blackburn; Price Giffen & Associates; Wayne Dedman; Jim Lowe, Inc.; Cinco Farms, Inc.; Brughelli Farms; Polvadero Farms; R & N Farms; Richard Swearingen; Three Rocks Ranch; United States of America; Department of Interior; Bureau of Reclamation; Cecil D. Andrus; Guy R. Martin; R. Keith Higginson; Billy E. Martin; Defendants. WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, Counterclaimant and Cross-Claimant, v. BARCELLOS & WOLFSEN, INC. et al., Counterclaim and Cross-Claim Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. California.

April 25, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donnelly, Clark & Chase by Robert M. Newell, Jr., and William M. Smiland, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs and counterclaim and cross-claim defendants.

Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedmann & Girard by Adolph Moskovitz, Sacramento, Cal., for defendant and counterclaimant and cross-claimant Westlands Water District.

Berryhill, Kuney & Burckhardt by Kenneth A. Kuney, Tulare, Cal., for defendants, John Blackburn, Price Giffen & Associates, Wayne Dedman, Jim Lowe, Inc., and Cinco Farms, Inc.

Diepenbrock, Wulff, Plant & Hannegan by Forrest A. Plant and Jack V. Lovell, Sacramento, Cal., for defendants, Brughelli Farms and Richard Swearingen.

Herman Sillas, U. S. Atty. by Solomon E. Robinson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants, United States of America, Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Cecil D. Andrus, Guy R. Martin, R. Keith Higginson, and Billy E. Martin.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PRICE, District Judge.

The motion of the United States of America, Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Cecil D. Andrus, Guy R. Martin, R. Keith Higginson and Bill E. Martin, hereinafter referred to as "The Federal Defendants" to dismiss the plaintiff's Third Amendment Complaint and Supplemental Complaint came on for hearing before the Court on Monday, March 31, 1980. Calendared for hearing at the same time and heard simultaneously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases