1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 495 F.Supp.
  5. 495 F.Supp. 253 (1980)
 

LORIA & WEINHAUS, INC. v. H. R. KAMINSKY & SONS

No. 78 Civ. 1533 (CHT).

495 F.Supp. 253 (1980)

LORIA & WEINHAUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. H. R. KAMINSKY & SONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

August 18, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Van Muraskin, New York City, for plaintiff.

James A. Math, Mineola, N. Y., for defendant.

OPINION

TENNEY, District Judge.

Defendant H. R. Kaminsky & Sons, Inc. ("Kaminsky") renews its motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Loria & Weinhaus, Inc. on the ground that the defendant is not "doing business" in New York and cannot be subject to jurisdiction here. In a prior Opinion, 80 F.R.D. 494 (S.D.N.Y.1978), the Court described the facts of this case and the relevant jurisdictional principles.1 That discussion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases