The respondent does not dispute that on May 26, 1978 he was directed by a fair hearing decision to compute the petitioner's benefits in behalf of her children in a certain manner and that he has continuously failed to obey the direction. After repeated oral demands by petitioner and/or her representatives to the office representatives of the respondent (e.g., an administrative hearing specialist, a senior examiner, caseworkers) for compliance with the decision, the petitioner...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
