1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 74 A.D.2d
  5. 74 A.D.2d 666 (1980)
 

MATTER OF LANKFORD v. PROGNO

74 A.D.2d 666 (1980)

In the Matter of the Claim of Clair M. Lankford, Respondent, v. John Progno et al., Appellants. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

February 7, 1980

Claimant was employed as an assistant race horse trainer at the Finger Lakes Race Track. In caring for the horses, he applied the drugs Phenylbutazone (Bute) and Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) to the horses' extremities. On several occasions he ingested Bute tablets. Prior to his employment he had been in good health and had no history of blood disease. The board found on the entire record that claimant was exposed to Bute and DMSO in his employment and such exposure caused him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases