GRAYDON v. PASADENA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Docket No. 56242.

104 Cal.App.3d 631 (1980)

164 Cal. Rptr. 56

GENEVIEVE GRAYDON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PASADENA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY et al., Defendants and Respondents; ERNEST W. HAHN, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

March 25, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sheldon B. Chernove for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Hahn & Hahn, David K. Robinson, Jacobs, Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Eugene B. Jacobs, Robert P. Berkman and T. Brent Hawkins for Defendants and Respondents.

Barrett, Stearns, Collins, Gleason & Kinney and William N. Willens for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

McCLOSKY, J.*

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying a writ of mandate and awarding costs of suit to respondent, Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. (hereafter Hahn).

Respondent the Pasadena Redevelopment Agency (hereafter sometimes Agency and sometimes PRA), following many studies, plans and negotiations, entered into an agreement in 1975...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases