ORDER
The defendants' motion to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Rule 16(g) is denied for noncompliance with Supreme Court Rule 28. An examination of the record in this case reveals that the requirements of Super.R.Civ.P. 54(b) have not been satisfied. That rule permits the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all the parties, but only after an express determination by the trial justice that there is no just reason for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.