1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 626 F.2d
  5. 626 F.2d 95 (1980)
 

KITTITAS RECLAMATION v. SUNNYSIDE VALLEY IRR.

No. 78-3065.

626 F.2d 95 (1980)

KITTITAS RECLAMATION DISTRICT; United States of America et al., Appellees, v. SUNNYSIDE VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT et al., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 28, 1980.

Rehearing Denied September 10, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles C. Flower, Yakima, Wash., for appellants.

Thomas G. Nelson, Twinfalls, Idaho, Anne S. Almy, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellees; Donald H. Bond, Yakima, Wash., James W. Moorman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Robert M. Sweeney, Spokane, Wash., Daniel R. Peterson, Sunnyside, Wash., on brief.

Before DUNIWAY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and BONSAL, District Judge.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

In this action, as part of its continuing jurisdiction over a consent decree entered in 1945, the district court entered a Memorandum and Order interpreting and administering the consent decree. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District (Sunnyside) appeals that Memorandum and Order.

I. FACTS

This case had its genesis in a declaratory action in 1939. The action had been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases