HILL v. COCHRAN


175 N.J. Super. 542 (1980)

420 A.2d 1038

WILTON HILL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAMES COCHRAN AND RICHARD P. NOONAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mathews, Goebel & Adams, attorneys for appellant (H. Hume Mathews on the brief).

Philip C. Geibel, attorney for respondent Richard P. Noonan (Stuart J. Fields on the brief).

Before Judges ALLCORN, KOLE and PRESSLER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, J.A.D.

In Fitzgerald v. Wright, 155 N.J.Super. 494 (App.Div. 1978), and Elliott v. Simon, 157 N.J.Super. 495 (App.Div. 1978), we considered procedural and substantive problems generated by the threshold provisions of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1 et seq. This appeal raises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases