MUELLER v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER

No. 79SA547.

610 P.2d 104 (1980)

Daniel T. MUELLER, as an individual, the City and County of Denver, a Municipal Corporation, and Arthur Dill, Chief of Police for the City and County of Denver, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Jennifer Asplin and Donald T. Leidy, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 21, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holm & Dill, Professional Corporation, Jon L. Holm, Denver, for petitioner Daniel T. Mueller.

Halaby & Bahr, Theodore Halaby, Denver, for petitioners City & County of Denver and Arthur Dill.

Berkowitz & Berkowitz, Larry Berkowitz, Denver, for respondents Jennifer Asplin and Donald T. Leidy.


LEE, Justice.

In this original proceeding, we issued a rule to show cause why respondent district court should not be prohibited from ordering petitioner, Daniel T. Mueller, to answer interrogatories and to respond to a request for production of documents when Mueller made an untimely objection based on his privilege against self-incrimination. We now make the rule absolute.

This case arose from an incident in which Jennifer Asplin and Donald Leidy, while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases