Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered.
At defendant's trial, the People introduced an eavesdropping tape which contained a conversation between defendant and a major drug dealer. No suppression motion was made by defendant. On direct examination defendant admitted that he was one of the parties speaking on the tape. The People also concede that the conversation was from one of the tapes invalidated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
