AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. v. PARA MFG. CO.


176 N.J. Super. 532 (1980)

424 A.2d 423

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, AS P I P CARRIER FOR WILMA PAVUK, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. PARA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 12, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth J. Doukas, Jr. argued the cause for the appellant (Hoagland, Longo, Oropollo & Moran, attorneys; Kenneth J. Doukas, Jr. on the brief).

Dennis F. Carey, III argued the cause for respondent (Dwyer, Connell & Lisbona, attorneys; Alfred A. Arnold on the brief).

Before Judges BISCHOFF, MILMED and FRANCIS.


PER CURIAM.

The question on this appeal is whether a PIP carrier can institute a workers' compensation proceeding as a means of enforcing its statutory right to deduct collectible workers' compensation benefits from PIP benefits. The question was answered in the affirmative in Solimano v. Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co., 146 N.J.Super. 393 (Law Div. 1977). However, in Wagner v. Transamerica Ins. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases