Judgment affirmed.
It was improper for the Trial Justice to overrule defense counsel's objection to the District Attorney's cross-examination of defendant's character witness as to specific acts of misconduct on the night of the burglary (see Richardson, Evidence [10th ed], § 153, p 124). However, in light of the witness' responses to the questions and the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the error was harmless (see People v Crimmins,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.