OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
In this medical malpractice action the sole question is the necessity for expert medical testimony.
On the trial, the jury awarded plaintiff the sum of $1,224.48. The Court of Appeals reversed and dismissed, holding that such testimony was required.
I.
Factual Background
The basic facts are not in dispute. On April 14, 1976, petitioner, while operating this power lawnmower, ran over a piece...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
