BATTIS v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COMMISSION

Nos. UU-459, UU-395 and UU-457.

386 So.2d 295 (1980)

Arthur BATTIS, Jr., Reginald Payne and Earl Bernard Sutton, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 24, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Battis, Jr., pro se.

Reginald Payne, pro se.

Earl Bernard Sutton, pro se.

Michael H. Davidson, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Commission, Tallahassee, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The petitioners seek relief from the commission's failure to act in setting their presumptive parole release dates. Like petitions have been presented to the court with increasing frequency, and counsel for the respondent admits that without direction from this court the commission is unable to chart a course out of what is perceived as an insoluble dilemma.

Section 947.16, Florida Statutes, provides that every person who has been convicted of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases