1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 175 N.J.
  5. 175 N.J. Super. 501 (1980)
 

GRIGGS v. BERTRAM

175 N.J. Super. 501 (1980)

420 A.2d 364

CLINTON GRIGGS, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SUMNER GRIGGS AND SUMNER GRIGGS, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS, v. WILLIAM BERTRAM ET AL., DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE FRANKLIN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 23, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard F. Boglioli argued the cause for appellant (Boglioli, Stamelman & Stein, attorneys; Lawrence S. Reynolds on the brief).

Edward K. Zuckerman argued the cause for respondent (Rosenhouse, Cutler & Zuckerman, attorneys; Edward K. Zuckerman on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ, POLOW and JOELSON.

PER CURIAM.

The facts, essentially undisputed, appear in the published opinion of the trial judge, 163 N.J.Super. 87, 394 A.2d 174 (Law Div. 1978). We affirm.

No bad faith on the part of the settling parties appears, despite the unique nature of the arrangement. The disclaiming insurance company, appellant here, did not demonstrate that the settlement was unreasonable. Indeed, rather...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases