1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 265 S.E.2d
  5. 265 S.E.2d 407 (1980)
 

COLSON v. SHAW

No. 7818SC631.

265 S.E.2d 407 (1980)

Sebastian Lee COLSON, by His Guardian Ad Litem Clarence V. Mattocks and Patricia Ann Colson v. Mamie Macon SHAW and Dan R. Douglass.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 6, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schoch, Schoch & Schoch by Arch Schoch, Jr., High Point, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Brinkley, Walser, McGirt, Miller & Smith by Charles H. McGirt and D. Clark Smith, Jr., Lexington, for defendant-appellee, Mamie Macon Shaw.

Smith, Moore, Smith, Schell & Hunter by J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Greensboro, for defendant-appellee Dan R. Douglass.

PARKER, Judge.

Defendants' motions for directed verdict present the question whether the evidence, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, is sufficient to justify a verdict in their favor as against either defendant. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E.2d 396 (1971). We shall so consider the evidence as it relates to the plaintiffs' claims of negligence against each...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases